Simmons v. State
924 So. 2d 970, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243, 2006 WL 932533
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Simmons v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 886 So. 2d 399 →
Opinion
Clarence Simmons appeals his judgment and sentence for possession of marijuana and trafficking in cocaine. Although the trial court erroneously allowed the State to introduce inadmissible hearsay statements regarding Simmons under the guise of impeachment, we conclude such error was harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Simmons v. State, 924 So. 2d 970, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243, 2006 WL 932533 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
924 So. 2d 970 (Simmons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)