Simmons v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Simmons v. State

378 So. 2d 1313, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15444

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Simmons v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17277 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 1980·No. No. 79-751·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We remand so that the lower court may strike the portion of the revocation order finding that appellant failed to pay monthly supervisory fees, because there was no proof that appellant had the financial ability to make the payments. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla.2d DCA 1979). We otherwise affirm the order of revocation, and the judgment and sentence.

GRIMES, C. J., and BOARDMAN and RYDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We remand so that the lower court may strike the portion of the revocation order finding that appellant failed to pay monthly supervisory fees, because there was no proof that appellant had the financial ability to make the payments. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla.2d DCA 1979). We otherwise affirm the order of revocation, and the judgment and sentence.

GRIMES, C. J., and BOARDMAN and RYDER, JJ., concur.

Simmons v. State, 378 So. 2d 1313, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15444 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

378 So. 2d 1313 (Simmons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related