Simmons v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Simmons v. State

156 So. 22, 115 Fla. 733, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1675

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 9, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted for the -offense of murder in the first degree and was' convicted of manslaughter.

The - only question presented to us is that of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. The same •question was presented to the trial court on motion for new; trial, which motion was overruled.

There is sufficient substantial evidence disclosed by the record to sustain the verdict and judgment.

The judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown.and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted for the -offense of murder in the first degree and was' convicted of manslaughter.

The - only question presented to us is that of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. The same •question was presented to the trial court on motion for new; trial, which motion was overruled.

There is sufficient substantial evidence disclosed by the record to sustain the verdict and judgment.

The judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown.and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Simmons v. State, 156 So. 22, 115 Fla. 733, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1675 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

156 So. 22 (Simmons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.