Simmons v. State

156 So. 22, 115 Fla. 733, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1675
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 9, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 156 So. 22 (Simmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simmons v. State, 156 So. 22, 115 Fla. 733, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1675 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted for the -offense of murder in the first degree and was' convicted of manslaughter.

The - only question presented to us is that of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. The same •question was presented to the trial court on motion for new; trial, which motion was overruled.

There is sufficient substantial evidence disclosed by the record to sustain the verdict and judgment.

The judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown.and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 So. 22, 115 Fla. 733, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-state-fla-1934.