Simmons v. State

15 S.W.3d 344, 341 Ark. 251, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 214
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 4, 2000·No. CR 00-425·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State brings this Motion for Rule on the IAM. alleging that the Clerk of the Court improperly declined to file the State’s petition for review of the court of appeals’s decision denying the State’s motion to dismiss in this case. From the pleadings, it appears that there is a dispute as to whether appellee perfected a conditional plea of guilty in order to preserve his right to appeal. The court of appeals’ decision to deny the motion to dismiss will permit that court to review that question as it considers the merits of the appeal. In these circumstances, we do not review the denial of a motion for dismissal by the court of appeals. The court of appeals has determined that it will review this case on its merits and the Clerk of the Court correcdy declined to lodge the State’s petition; therefore, we deny the State’s motion for Rule on the Clerk.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons v. State, 15 S.W.3d 344, 341 Ark. 251, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 214 (Ark. 2000).

15 S.W.3d 344 (Simmons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartwick v. Hill
73 S.W.3d 15 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2002)
Simmons v. State
34 S.W.3d 768 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2000)
Glass v. State
16 S.W.3d 543 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)