Simmons v. State

494 So. 2d 462, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5962
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMarch 11, 1986
Docket3 Div. 757
StatusPublished

This text of 494 So. 2d 462 (Simmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simmons v. State, 494 So. 2d 462, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5962 (Ala. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinions

LEIGH M. CLARK, Retired Circuit Judge.

A jury found this appellant guilty on a trial on an indictment that charged in pertinent part that “Charles B. Simmons ... did, intentionally cause the death of another person, Jessica Grant, by hitting her with his hand or an object otherwise unknown to the Grand Jury, in violation of Section 13A-6-2 of the Code of Alabama.” After the court adjudged the defendant guilty, a sentencing hearing was conducted subsequent to the State’s having given due notice to defendant and his counsel that it would proceed against defendant pursuant to the Habitual Felony Offender Act. The court sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for life, it being shown without dispute that defendant had been previously convicted of two felonies.

We now proceed to consider the only two issues presented in brief of counsel for appellant, which are:

“1. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN DENYING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL BY APPLYING THE SCINTILLA RULE?
“2. WAS THERE SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF EACH ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE OF MURDER FOR THE COURT TO CONSIDER IN RULING UPON THE DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE THE STATE’S EVIDENCE?”

It is to be noted that each of the two issues is substantially the same as the other, i.e., appellant contends by each of the issues that the evidence was not sufficient to present a jury question as to defendant’s guilt because in a criminal case a submission to a jury of the question of defendant’s guilt is dependent upon the existence of substantial evidence of his guilt, in contrast with the principle of law applied in civil cases that a plaintiff is entitled to have his case submitted to a jury if there is a scintilla of evidence in his favor as to the gravamen of his complaint.

According to the undisputed evidence, on the trial of this case, Jessica Grant, the alleged victim, was born December 21, 1981, of her unwed mother, Mary Ann Grant, and died at her home on the night of February 4-5, 1982. Mary Ann Grant was the first witness for the State on the trial of the case. She testified at length as to the circumstances of the death of her daughter. In the early part of her testimony, she stated that C.B. Simmons, the defendant, killed her baby.

Dr. Thomas Gilchrist, a forensic pathologist with the Alabama State Department of Forensic Sciences, was the second witness for the State. He testified that on February 5, 1982, he performed a post-mortem examination of the body of Jessica Grant [464]*464and found that it was “thin and emaciated, small” and that “the actual cause of death” was “blunt injury to the head.” He further testified:

“A. There were several areas that had deep bruises on the head indicating a number of blunt injuries to the head.
“Q. Some worse than others?
“A. Yes.
“Q. Which was the worst one, please, sir?
“A. The bruises were on the right front at the very top of the left side in back of the head. The injury to the underlying brain was only below the one on the very top of the head.
“Q. And how severe was that injury to the brain?
“A. It’s a bruising of the brain which indicates a severe force applied to the head.
“Q. Would it have caused swelling of any nature?
“A. No. Injuries of this sort to the brain, actually bruising of the brain, always invariably results in swelling of the brain.
[[Image here]]
“A. Well, the time I saw the child, rigor mortis had not developed but libor [sic] mortis had. However, the development of rigor mortis in a severely emaciated infant is not as dependable as it is in adults. The body was cool but it had been cooler. My evidence would indicate that the body had been dead more than a day or two or three but then my evidence is not nearly as good as people at the scene. Because when I saw the body it had been placed in a cooler the evening before and locked in and secured. So body warmth and things like that were artificially changed.
[[Image here]]
“A. My opinion was that death occurred within two to three days. I didn’t say one or a half day. That would fit in that time frame; therefore, it would be consistent.”

Among the items of evidence relied upon in the brief of counsel for appellant was a copy of a statement given by Mary Grant to police officers, which was admitted into evidence as Defendant’s Exhibit 4. We now quote from appellant’s brief that part of her statement relied upon by appellant’s attorney:

“Q. Mary, what do you know about the physical abuse Jessica received, prior to the time of her death?
“A. Well, Mr. C.B. Simmons threw the baby against the floor. Well C.B. had been trying to go with me. He came to my house on Wednesday night which would be the 3 of February. He brought some gin with him. I think it was half a pint. He had been drinking before he got there. He set around and drank for a while, I had two drinks and C.B. had three drinks. C.B. got drunk and he started trying to have sex with me and this went on pretty well all night. He started tussling with me, he was cussing and hollering at me and he woke Patricia up. Patricia was hollering at C.B. and telling him to leave me alone. Jessie was crying too. Casandra was sitting up in the bed and she was crying too. He grabbed Jessica up by her feet and slung her head against the floor, then he picked Jessica up with both hands around her ribs and shook her. Then he throwed Jessica back on the bed. I went to him and told him what did he do that for and he shoved me down. I told him that I was going to call the police and he told me that he would kill me. Patricia tried to go out the door and he told her if she did that he would kill her. I started fighting him again and he went out the door. Oh, Patricia got the broom after him. Well that is about it.
“Q. Mary, what time did C.B. Simmons come to your house on the Wednesday you referred to in the other question?
“A. It was about 6:00 pm.
“Q. Mary, what time was it when he threw Jessica on the floor?
“A. It was in the early morning hours on Thursday about daylight.
[465]*465“Q. Mary, what happened to Jessica after C.B. Simmons had thrown her on the bed?
“A. She cried about half of a minute then she stopped.
“Q. Mary, did Jessica ever cry any more after the half minute?
“A. No.
“Q. Was Jessica still alive when you put her down at 6:30 a.m.?
“A. Yes, she was.
“Q. Mary, who found Jessica dead on Thursday afternoon?
“A. My mother found that Jessica was dead in the bed about 2:30 pm. My mother had come to my house about 12 noon.
“Q. Have you told anyone else what you just told us?
“A. No.
“Q. Mary, why have you not told us this earlier?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. State
314 So. 2d 857 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)
Davis v. State
18 So. 2d 282 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1944)
Sutherland v. State
139 So. 110 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1932)
Fahrig v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.
423 U.S. 951 (Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
494 So. 2d 462, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-state-alacrimapp-1986.