Simmons v. . Simmons

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Simmons v. . Simmons

28 S.E.2d 489, 223 N.C. 841, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 259

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 12, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 28 S.E.2d 489 (Simmons v. . Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simmons v. . Simmons, 28 S.E.2d 489, 223 N.C. 841, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 259 (N.C. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The question sought to be presented is whether the judgment for subsistence entered herein on 15 July, 1941, can survive the *843 judgment of absolute divorce obtained by the defendant on 21 September, 1942, under the two-years’ separation statute. C. S., 1663. The cases of Dyer v. Dyer, 212 N. C., 620, 194 S. E., 278; S. c., 213 N. C., 634, 197 S. E., 157; Edmundson v. Edmundson, 222 N. C., 181, 22 S. E. (2d), 576; and Howell v. Howell, 206 N. C., 672, 174 S. E., 921, would seem to require an affirmative answer. The defendant’s effort to differentiate these decisions because of alleged dissimilar fact situations was unsuccessful in the court below, and we are disposed to take the same view of the matter.

On the present record, however, it may be doubted whether the appeal can be maintained, since the contempt proceeding was brought to a close when the defendant paid all amounts in arrears, and the rule against him was discharged. Of course, the declaration that defendant would still be liable for future installments under the original judgment adds nothing to its effectiveness. It expresses an obvious conclusion or corollary, perhaps, albeit the only question before the court was the defendant’s alleged willful refusal to pay the past-due installments. When these were paid the end sought by the contempt proceeding was reached.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stacy, C. J.

The question sought to be presented is whether the judgment for subsistence entered herein on 15 July, 1941, can survive the *843 judgment of absolute divorce obtained by the defendant on 21 September, 1942, under the two-years’ separation statute. C. S., 1663. The cases of Dyer v. Dyer, 212 N. C., 620, 194 S. E., 278; S. c., 213 N. C., 634, 197 S. E., 157; Edmundson v. Edmundson, 222 N. C., 181, 22 S. E. (2d), 576; and Howell v. Howell, 206 N. C., 672, 174 S. E., 921, would seem to require an affirmative answer. The defendant’s effort to differentiate these decisions because of alleged dissimilar fact situations was unsuccessful in the court below, and we are disposed to take the same view of the matter.

On the present record, however, it may be doubted whether the appeal can be maintained, since the contempt proceeding was brought to a close when the defendant paid all amounts in arrears, and the rule against him was discharged. Of course, the declaration that defendant would still be liable for future installments under the original judgment adds nothing to its effectiveness. It expresses an obvious conclusion or corollary, perhaps, albeit the only question before the court was the defendant’s alleged willful refusal to pay the past-due installments. When these were paid the end sought by the contempt proceeding was reached.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 S.E.2d 489, 223 N.C. 841, 1944 N.C. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-simmons-nc-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack