Simmons v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMarch 2, 2015
Docket13-274
StatusUnpublished

This text of Simmons v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Simmons v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simmons v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2015).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 13-274V (Not to be published)

***************************** * WILLIE ANDRE SIMMONS, * * Petitioner, * Filed: February 4, 2015 * v. * Decision by Stipulation; Damages; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; * Chronic Inflammatory SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * Demyelinating Polyneuropathy HUMAN SERVICES, * (“CIDP”) * Respondent. * * * ***************************** Danielle Anne Strait, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Traci R. Patton, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On April 18, 2013, Petitioner Willie Andre Simmons filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Vaccine Program”). 2 Petitioner alleges that he suffered Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my action in this case, I will post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the posted decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole decision will be available to the public. (Id.) 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) and related complications as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccine.

Respondent denies that Petitioner’s CIDP and any related medical problems were caused by the receipt of the flu vaccine. Nonetheless both parties, while maintaining their above-stated positions, agreed in a stipulation filed February 4, 2015 that the issues before them can be settled, and that a decision should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation.

I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein.

The stipulation awards:

a. A lump sum of $806,560.40, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for past and future lost earnings, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future unreimbursable out of pocket expenses; and

b. A lump sum of $46,609.27, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and SC Department of Health & Human Services. This amount represents reimbursement of a State of South Carolina Medicaid lien.

Stipulation ¶ 8.

I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Special Master

42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa-10-' 300aa-34 (West 1991 & Supp. 2002). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa. 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by jointly filing notice renouncing their right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) WILLIE ANDRE SIMMONS, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 13-274V v. ) Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Willie Andre Simmons, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10 et seq. (the “Vaccine

Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to Mr. Simmons’s

receipt of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table

(the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received his flu immunization on December 1, 2010.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that the flu vaccine caused him to suffer Chronic Inflammatory

Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”).

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer CIDP or any other

injury or condition.

1 7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payments:

a. A lump sum of $806,560.40, which amount represents compensation for past and future lost earnings, past and future pain and suffering, and past and future unreimbursable out of pocket expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioner; and

b. A lump sum of $46,609.27, which amount represents reimbursement of a State of South Carolina Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and

SC Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS) Reporting and Receivables P.O. Box 8355 Columbia, SC 290202-9189 Re: Case Number 299320 Medicaid No.: 8781354645

Petitioner agrees to endorse the check to the SC Department of Health & Human

Services (DHHS).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

2 under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Simmons v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2015.