Simmons v. Sacchetti

934 N.E.2d 877, 15 N.Y.3d 797, 908 N.Y.S.2d 144
New York Court of Appeals·Decided August 31, 2010·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by denying the motion of defendants Vito Sacchetti and TMS Management Company for summary judgment in the entirety and the motion of defendant Ambassador Fuel and Oil Burner Corp. insofar as it sought to dismiss the cross claims against it and, as so modified, affirmed.

Triable issues of fact exist as to whether defendants Sacchetti and TMS negligently failed to maintain the apartment building’s boiler and domestic hot water system in a reasonably safe condition and whether the negligence of those defendants proximately caused the infant plaintiffs injuries. Issues of fact also exist as to whether the conduct of the infant plaintiff’s mother and brother constituted a superseding cause of her injuries. However, the record establishes as a matter of law that defendant Ambassador did not violate any duty owed to plaintiffs.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCKR 500.11), order modified, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons v. Sacchetti, 934 N.E.2d 877, 15 N.Y.3d 797, 908 N.Y.S.2d 144 (N.Y. 2010).

934 N.E.2d 877 (Simmons v. Sacchetti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A.M. v. New York City Hous. Auth.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019
Eaderesto v. 22 Leroy Owners Corp.
101 A.D.3d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Moshe K. v. Nu Kol Tuv, Inc.
98 A.D.3d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)