Simmons v. Roseland Security Vault Co.

163 N.E. 333, 331 Ill. 563
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 25, 1928
DocketNo. 17888. Judgment affirmed.
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 163 N.E. 333 (Simmons v. Roseland Security Vault Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simmons v. Roseland Security Vault Co., 163 N.E. 333, 331 Ill. 563 (Ill. 1928).

Opinions

Defendants in error, Charles H. Simmons, as trustee, the Chicago Title and Trust Company, as trustee, and D.L.M. Simmons, filed their bill in the superior court of Cook county against the Roseland Security Vault Company, the Kimbark State Bank and Ewald E. Muller, its receiver, to foreclose two trust deeds. The bill alleged that on March 8, 1916, the Roseland Security Vault Company (herein referred to as the vault company) executed a promissory note, payable to itself, for $7500, secured by a second trust deed to the Chicago Title and Trust Company; that on March 8, 1918, the vault company executed a series of notes aggregating $3800, secured by a third deed of trust to Charles H. Simmons; that D.L.M. Simmons is the owner of these notes and the holder of these trust deeds; that both trust deeds cover property which is now owned by the Kimbark State Bank, that the indebtedness has not been paid, and the prayer was for a foreclosure.

The vault company filed an answer admitting the execution of the notes and trust deeds, alleging that on September 1, 1918, it conveyed all of the property covered by the trust deeds subject to a first trust deed of $30,000, and that it had no further interest in the property. The bank and its receiver filed an answer, in which they denied that the $3800 third deed of trust was executed for a valuable consideration, and denied substantially all the allegations of the bill with reference to both deeds. In their second amended answer they denied that the property was subject to the lien of the two trust deeds and averred that on March 11, 1916, three days after the date of the $7500 trust deed, the vault company executed to Greenebaum Sons Bank and Trust Company a note for $30,000, and a trust deed securing the same, which was recorded on March 21, 1916, seven days before the $7500 trust deed was recorded; that the $30,000 trust deed was a valid lien on the property; that neither *Page 565 the $7500 note nor the second trust deed is valid because (1) both were executed by the vault company without consideration; (2) both were executed for purposes ultra vires the vault company and its officers and directors and in payment or renewal of a prior note secured by the trust deed of the vault company, dated March 9, 1915, the proceeds of which prior note were used to pay the debts of the State Bank of Calumet, in which the directors of the vault company were interested; (3) both were executed in pursuance of an illegal and fraudulent conspiracy against the rights and interests of the vault company, its stockholders and creditors; (4) when the bank acquired title to the property, on September 27, 1918, sufficient funds were set apart to pay the $7500 note, but these funds were fraudulently appropriated for the individual use of certain conspirators, among whom were the assignors of D.L.M. Simmons. The answer further alleged that the $7500 trust deed was delivered to the officers of the vault company individually and they hypothecated it as security for their individual note of $6300, and the money realized from the $6300 note, together with $1200 borrowed from J.L. Long, was used to pay a prior $7500 trust deed; that Frank H. and Charles W. Novak made all of the payments on the $6300 note and were the owners of the $7500 trust deed when it was transferred to D.L.M. Simmons and are now the beneficial owners thereof; that said trust deed was transferred to Simmons three years after it was due, in order that he might foreclose it; that the vault company on September 27, 1918, sold the real estate covered by the trust deeds to Joseph C. Willis for $33,500, subject to a first deed of trust of $30,000, dated March 11, 1916, to the Greenebaum bank; that on September 27, 1918, Willis conveyed the premises to the Kimbark State Bank for $33,500, subject only to this $30,000 deed of trust; that Willis paid Novak upon the delivery of said deeds either $11,500 or $22,500; that the funds received by the vault company from Willis constituted *Page 566 the only assets of the vault company, which was insolvent, and that the Novaks, as directors and officers, appropriated the funds received from Willis to their own use in payment of fictitious and pretended claims against the vault company, for the purpose of defrauding the bank, which was a creditor of the vault company by reason of its implied warranty against encumbrances in the deed of the vault company to Willis.

The defendants in error filed an amendment to their bill, in which they alleged that each of the trust deeds was executed and filed for record; that long after the execution and recording of said instruments the vault company, through its officers, agreed to sell the premises to Willis for $63,500; that at that time there was a valid first lien on the real estate for $30,000 to the Greenebaum bank; that under the terms of the agreement with Willis he was to take the real estate subject to this lien of $30,000 and was to pay the balance of the purchase price of $33,500 in cash, and out of the proceeds the vault company was to pay the two trust deeds sought to be foreclosed; that the deed to Willis was executed by the vault company but Willis was unable to pay all of the purchase money, and it was agreed that Willis should retain out of the $33,500, money sufficient to pay the indebtedness secured by the two trust deeds sought to be foreclosed; that thereafter Willis conveyed the premises to the bank, of which Muller is receiver, and that Willis, and all persons claiming by, through and under him, are estopped and barred from asserting any of said defenses in bar of the foreclosure.

Upon issue being joined the cause was referred to a master, who found that Willis executed a deed to the Kimbark State Bank on September 27, 1918, in consideration of $33,500, and subject to a trust deed to the Greenebaum bank for $30,000, of which $29,000 remained unpaid; that Willis was elected a director of the bank on November 23, 1918, and on February 5, 1919, he was elected president and *Page 567 continued to act as such until January 15, 1920; that no record was made on the books of the bank regarding the two trust deeds sought to be foreclosed, but said trust deeds were of record in Cook county and unreleased at the time of the conveyance to the bank; that Willis retained out of the purchase price $11,300 and agreed to pay the trust deeds but failed to do so; that there is no testimony showing that Willis and the Novaks conspired to use any of the money for their own purposes, neither does it appear that the money realized from the trust deeds was used for purposes other than the satisfaction of debts of the vault company; that Willis was practically the organizer of the bank and became its president, had full knowledge of all the encumbrances against the real estate and agreed to pay the same, and neither he nor the bank, nor its receivers, can question the validity of said trust deeds. The report found that both trust deeds were existing liens and recommended that a decree of foreclosure be entered. Exceptions were overruled and a decree of foreclosure was entered. From that decree Muller, as receiver, prosecuted an appeal to the Appellate Court for the First District, where the decree was affirmed, and the cause is before this court upon a writ ofcertiorari prosecuted by Muller, as receiver.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montgomery v. Commercial Trust & Savings Bank
3 N.E.2d 139 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1936)
Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Watson Industries, Inc.
198 N.E. 704 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1935)
Myers v. American National Bank & Trust Co.
277 Ill. App. 378 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1934)
Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Watson Industries Inc.
277 Ill. App. 585 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1934)
Hunt v. Rosenbaum Grain Corp.
189 N.E. 907 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1934)
Knass v. Madison & Kedzie State Bank
269 Ill. App. 588 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1933)
Calumet National Bank v. South Chicago Savings Bank
266 Ill. App. 69 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1932)
First National Bank v. Wine
255 Ill. App. 578 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 N.E. 333, 331 Ill. 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-roseland-security-vault-co-ill-1928.