Simmons v. Pantoja

25 A.D.3d 777, 807 N.Y.S.2d 577

This text of 25 A.D.3d 777 (Simmons v. Pantoja) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simmons v. Pantoja, 25 A.D.3d 777, 807 N.Y.S.2d 577 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

an action, inter alia, to recover on a promissory note, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered December 21, 2004, as denied his motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment since the defendant failed to establish his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]). Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A.D.3d 777, 807 N.Y.S.2d 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-pantoja-nyappdiv-2006.