Simmons v. Johnson

303 S.E.2d 101, 279 S.C. 146, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 296
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 12, 1983
Docket21926
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 S.E.2d 101 (Simmons v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simmons v. Johnson, 303 S.E.2d 101, 279 S.C. 146, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 296 (S.C. 1983).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Rick Alexander Simmons appeals a family court order finding him to be the father of the minor son and unborn child or children of Ella Jane Johnson. A hearing on the financial status of the parties was also ordered.

Each of appellant’s exceptions is in violation of Supreme Court Rule 4, Section 6, which requires an exception to contain a complete assignment of error. This defect is sufficient to warrant dismissal of the appeal. Howell v. Department of Social Services, 293 S. E. (2d) 851 (S. C. 1982).

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for failure to meet the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 4, Section 6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charleston Housewrecking Co. v. Canadian Universal Insurance
319 S.E.2d 338 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
303 S.E.2d 101, 279 S.C. 146, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-johnson-sc-1983.