Simmons v. Johnson
This text of Simmons v. Johnson (Simmons v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7708
ALTON SIMMONS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SARAH E. JOHNSON; COLBERT L. REPASS; HATTIE PIMPONG; RICK ANDERSON; OFFICER TRUEBLOOD; SERGEANT BUNDY; ROBIN JONES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03017-D)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alton Simmons, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Alton Simmons appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated
by the district court. Simmons v. Johnson, No. 5:10-ct-03017-D
(E.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Simmons v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-johnson-ca4-2011.