Simmons v. Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 2011
Docket10-7708
StatusUnpublished

This text of Simmons v. Johnson (Simmons v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simmons v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7708

ALTON SIMMONS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SARAH E. JOHNSON; COLBERT L. REPASS; HATTIE PIMPONG; RICK ANDERSON; OFFICER TRUEBLOOD; SERGEANT BUNDY; ROBIN JONES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03017-D)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alton Simmons, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alton Simmons appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed

in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated

by the district court. Simmons v. Johnson, No. 5:10-ct-03017-D

(E.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Simmons v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-johnson-ca4-2011.