Simmons v. Jaros
This text of 255 A.D.2d 939 (Simmons v. Jaros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondents failed to file written objections to the petition pursuant to Election Law § 6-154 (2). Further, respondents did not move to invalidate the petition pursuant to Election Law § 16-102. Respondents therefore may not raise their present challenge to the petition (see, Matter of Brosnan v Black, 104 AD2d 469, 471, affd 63 NY2d 692; see also, Matter of Swift v Huested, 176 AD2d 980). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sconiers, J. — Election Law.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Hayes and Boehm, JJ. (Filed Oct. 21, 1998.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D.2d 939, 679 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-v-jaros-nyappdiv-1998.