Simmons v. Gibbs Manufacturing Co.

Sixth Circuit

Simmons v. Gibbs Manufacturing Co.

275 F.2d 291

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 10, 1960·No. No. 13889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In an action filed by the appellants on behalf of a young boy three years of age against the appellee, the manufacturer of a toy spinning top, seeking damages for the loss of an eye alleged to have been caused by the negligent manufacture of the top, and tried to the Court without a jury, the District Judge found that the evidence failed to prove negligence on the part of the appellee, and dismissed the action.

The Court, being of the opinion that the finding is supporting by the evidence and is not clearly erroneous, Rule 52(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., See: Graffius v. Weather-Seal, 6 Cir., 165 F.2d 782.

It is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In an action filed by the appellants on behalf of a young boy three years of age against the appellee, the manufacturer of a toy spinning top, seeking damages for the loss of an eye alleged to have been caused by the negligent manufacture of the top, and tried to the Court without a jury, the District Judge found that the evidence failed to prove negligence on the part of the appellee, and dismissed the action.

The Court, being of the opinion that the finding is supporting by the evidence and is not clearly erroneous, Rule 52(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., See: Graffius v. Weather-Seal, 6 Cir., 165 F.2d 782.

It is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

Simmons v. Gibbs Manufacturing Co., 275 F.2d 291 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

275 F.2d 291 (Simmons v. Gibbs Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related