Simmons v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided November 14, 2024·No. 3:24-cv-00433·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ALICIA SIMMONS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL No. 3:24-cv-00433-SB ) COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL ) ORDER AWARDING FEES SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ) ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ) Defendant. ) It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $7,900.00 are awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The amount of this award shall be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney upon verification that Plaintiff validly assigned these EAJA fees to his attorney and that Plaintiff has no debt, which qualifies for offset against the award, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt and there is a valid assignment, then a check shall be made out to Plaintiff’s attorney, Rory Linerud, and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s mailing address. If Plaintiff has a debt, and/or if there is no valid assignment, then a check for any remaining funds, after any offset of the debt, shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney’s office. Payments may be made by electronic fund transfer (EFT) or by check. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this _ 14th day of November 2024. Sai 7, Fecver m7 HONORABLE STACIE F. BECKERMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presented by: /s/ Rory J. Linerud RORY J. LINERUD Oregon State Bar #970061 Attorney for Plaintiff Linerud Law Firm PO Box 5734 Salem, OR 97304 Phone: (971)218-6954 Email: Rory @ LinerudLawFirm.com Fax: (503)877-669 1

ORDER - EAJA FEES

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2024).

Simmons v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Simmons v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)