Simmons Pipe Bending Works v. Seymour

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Simmons Pipe Bending Works v. Seymour

78 A. 258, 80 N.J.L. 465, 51 Vroom 465, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 240

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedNovember 14, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 A. 258 (Simmons Pipe Bending Works v. Seymour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simmons Pipe Bending Works v. Seymour, 78 A. 258, 80 N.J.L. 465, 51 Vroom 465, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 240 (N.J. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

From a judgment in an action upon contract rendered by one of the District Courts of Newark, an appeal was taken to the Supreme Court, pursuant to the act. Pamph. L. 1902, p. 565. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment upon grounds expressed in the following per curiam:

“The state of the ease fails to show that any legal question was presented to the trial court. There is no objection to evidence, no request to find, and no exception to the actual finding. There is, therefore, no determination of the District Court in point of law or upon the admission or rejection of evidence for us to review. O'Donnell v. Weiler, 43 Vroom 142.”

We concur in the view thus expressed, and the judgment of the Supreme Court should therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI