Simmons, Patrick
This text of Simmons, Patrick (Simmons, Patrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-63,675-01
EX PARTE PATRICK SIMMONS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 2001CR4637 IN THE 175TH DISTRICT COURT
FROM BEXAR COUNTY
Per curiam.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus which was transmitted to this Court by the clerk of the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07. Applicant was convicted of the offense of driving while intoxicated, and punishment was assessed at eight (8) years' confinement. No direct appeal was taken.
Applicant contends that he should be granted an out-of-time appeal because he was under a disability that rendered him incapable of timely perfecting an appeal.
The trial court has entered findings of fact or conclusions of law finding that an out-of-time appeal should be denied because Applicant waived his right to appeal and the trial court has not granted permission to appeal. However, we do not believe that this finding is sufficient to completely resolve the issues presented. Because Applicant has stated facts requiring resolution and because this Court cannot hear evidence, it is necessary for the matter to be remanded to the trial court for resolution of those issues. The trial court may resolve those issues as set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3 (d), in that it may order affidavits, depositions, or interrogatories from Applicant's mental health care providers or it may order a hearing. In the appropriate case the trial court may rely on its personal recollection.
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall first decide whether Applicant is indigent. If the trial court finds that Applicant is indigent and Applicant desires to be represented by counsel, the trial court will then, pursuant to the provisions of Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04, appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing.
The trial court shall then make findings of fact as to whether Applicant was placed under a disability that prevented him from timely perfecting an appeal, and when and whether such disability was removed. The trial court shall also make any further findings of fact and conclusions of law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of the application for writ of habeas corpus.
Because this Court does not hear evidence, Ex Parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), this application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus will be held in abeyance pending the trial court's compliance with this order. The trial court shall resolve the issues presented within ninety (90) days of the date of this order. (1) A supplemental transcript containing any affidavits, the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any interrogatories or hearings held, along with the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within one hundred twenty (120) days of the date of this order. (2)
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2006.
EN BANC
DO NOT PUBLISH
1. In the event any continuances are granted, copies of the order granting the continuance
should be provided to this Court.
2. Any extensions of this time period should be obtained from this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Simmons, Patrick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-patrick-texcrimapp-2006.