Simmons, Jannace & Stagg, LLP v. the Buzbee Law Firm

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 30, 2010
Docket14-09-00699-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Simmons, Jannace & Stagg, LLP v. the Buzbee Law Firm (Simmons, Jannace & Stagg, LLP v. the Buzbee Law Firm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simmons, Jannace & Stagg, LLP v. the Buzbee Law Firm, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion filed September 30, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-09-00699-CV

SIMMONS, JANNACE & STAGG, L.L.P., Appellant

V.

THE BUZBEE LAW FIRM, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 60,368

O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 24, 2009.  The record reflects appellant, Simmons, Jannace & Stagg, L.L.P., is attempting to appear pro se.  The law firm of Simmons, Jannace & Stagg, L.L.P., may not proceed pro se.  “Corporations and partnerships, both of which are fictional legal persons, obviously cannot appear for themselves personally. . . .  [T]hey must be represented by counsel.”  Southwest Express Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 670 F.2d 53, 54 (5th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (interpreting 28 U.S.C. § 1654); accord Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993); see also Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code Ann. § 152.056 (Vernon Pamphlet 2009) (“A partnership is an entity distinct from its partners.”); Dell Dev. Corp. v. Best Indus. Uniform Supply Co., Inc., 743 S.W.2d 302 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1987, writ denied) (analogizing Tex. R. Civ. P. 7 to 28 U.S.C. § 1654).

On August 17, 2010, this court notified the parties that appellant’s brief would be stricken and the appeal subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless an attorney authorized to practice law in the State of Texas filed a substitute brief on behalf of appellant.  Appellant was informed the appeal would be dismissed unless it filed a response on or before September 6, 2010, showing meritorious grounds for continuing the appeal.

Appellant filed no response.  Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

                                                            /s/        Jeffrey V. Brown

                                                                        Justice

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Sullivan, and Christopher.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Simmons, Jannace & Stagg, LLP v. the Buzbee Law Firm, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmons-jannace-stagg-llp-v-the-buzbee-law-firm-texapp-2010.