Simmen v. Hovey

D.C. Circuit

Simmen v. Hovey

8 F.2d 1015, 56 App. D.C. 399, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3439

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 7, 1925

DocketPatent Appeal No. 1780

StatusPublished

This text of 8 F.2d 1015 (Simmen v. Hovey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simmen v. Hovey, 8 F.2d 1015, 56 App. D.C. 399, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3439 (D.C. Cir. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This case is closely related to two preceding cases, Patent Appeals Nos. 1776 and 1777, -App. D. C.-, 8 F.(2d) 1014, which involved the same testimony and the same application of Clark and Hovey.

Simmen’s application was filed March 13, 1915, and, since he has taken no testimony, he is restricted to that date for conception and reduction to practice. The tribunals below have held that the testimony for Clark and Hovey established conception in the fall of 1914, which was followed by a diligent reduction to practice. For the reasons more fully stated in our opinion in Appeal No. 1777, we concur in the ruling here. The decision therefore is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This case is closely related to two preceding cases, Patent Appeals Nos. 1776 and 1777, -App. D. C.-, 8 F.(2d) 1014, which involved the same testimony and the same application of Clark and Hovey.

Simmen’s application was filed March 13, 1915, and, since he has taken no testimony, he is restricted to that date for conception and reduction to practice. The tribunals below have held that the testimony for Clark and Hovey established conception in the fall of 1914, which was followed by a diligent reduction to practice. For the reasons more fully stated in our opinion in Appeal No. 1777, we concur in the ruling here. The decision therefore is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 F.2d 1015, 56 App. D.C. 399, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmen-v-hovey-cadc-1925.