Simmemon v. State

117 S.E. 471, 30 Ga. App. 113, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 289
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 1923
Docket14199
StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 471 (Simmemon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simmemon v. State, 117 S.E. 471, 30 Ga. App. 113, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 289 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case the court did not err in refusing to rule out evidence as to alleged dying declarations, as complained of in the 1st and 2d grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

2. The charge of the court upon the subject of dying declarations was not error for any reason assigned.

3. The statement of the accused authorized and demanded a charge upon the law of manslaughter.

4. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodicorth, J.J., concur. Permor Barrett, for plaintiff in error. Robert McMillan, solicitor-general, Joseph 0. Collins, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 471, 30 Ga. App. 113, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simmemon-v-state-gactapp-1923.