Simkoff v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.

118 A.D. 918, 103 N.Y.S. 1142

This text of 118 A.D. 918 (Simkoff v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simkoff v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 118 A.D. 918, 103 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented on "the ground that the finding of the jury that there was an opening between the outside edge of the southerly rail and the sidewalk planking, which was the only negligence submitted to the jury, w'as against the weight of the evidence, and also because of errors of the court in refusing to charge as requested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 A.D. 918, 103 N.Y.S. 1142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simkoff-v-lehigh-valley-railroad-co-nyappdiv-1907.