Simko v. P.V.M. Associates, Inc.

526 So. 2d 218, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2424, 1988 WL 59430
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1988
DocketNo. 4-86-3099
StatusPublished

This text of 526 So. 2d 218 (Simko v. P.V.M. Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simko v. P.V.M. Associates, Inc., 526 So. 2d 218, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2424, 1988 WL 59430 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the entry of summary judgment for the appellee because we do not believe the evidence has been sufficiently developed to determine whether the appel-lee is entitled to immunity under the line of cases exemplified by Booher v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., 468 So.2d 985 (Fla.1985), or barred from asserting such immunity under the line of cases exemplified by Noel v. E. Ecker & Co., 445 So.2d 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Noel v. M. Ecker & Co.
445 So. 2d 1142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Booher v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
468 So. 2d 985 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
526 So. 2d 218, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2424, 1988 WL 59430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simko-v-pvm-associates-inc-fladistctapp-1988.