Simko v. P.V.M. Associates, Inc.
526 So. 2d 218, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2424, 1988 WL 59430
Opinion
We reverse the entry of summary judgment for the appellee because we do not believe the evidence has been sufficiently developed to determine whether the appel-lee is entitled to immunity under the line of cases exemplified by Booher v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., 468 So.2d 985 (Fla.1985), or barred from asserting such immunity under the line of cases exemplified by Noel v. E. Ecker & Co., 445 So.2d 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Simko v. P.V.M. Associates, Inc., 526 So. 2d 218, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2424, 1988 WL 59430 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
526 So. 2d 218 (Simko v. P.V.M. Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Noel v. M. Ecker & Co.
445 So. 2d 1142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Booher v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
468 So. 2d 985 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)