Siminson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Siminson v. City of New York

21 A.D.2d 884, 252 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3395

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 884 (Siminson v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siminson v. City of New York, 21 A.D.2d 884, 252 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injury and loss of services resulting from the collapse of a building, the defendant City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 4, 1963, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint; and the defendant Albro Contracting Corporation appeals from an order of said court, dated August 5, 1963, -which denied its motion for the same relief. Orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements against the defendants jointly. Plaintiffs -were not parties to the prior action. On this record a question of fact is presented as to liability of the respective defendants for collapse of the building. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injury and loss of services resulting from the collapse of a building, the defendant City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 4, 1963, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint; and the defendant Albro Contracting Corporation appeals from an order of said court, dated August 5, 1963, -which denied its motion for the same relief. Orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements against the defendants jointly. Plaintiffs -were not parties to the prior action. On this record a question of fact is presented as to liability of the respective defendants for collapse of the building. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 884, 252 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siminson-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1964.