Simino v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Simino v. State

195 S.W.3d 548, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1053, 2006 WL 1889939

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 11, 2006·No. ED 87038·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Roy Simino (“Simino”) appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the Honorable James R. Hartenbach presiding, after the court denied Simino’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after Simino pled guilty to one count of Criminal Nonsupport, Section 568.040 RSMo. (2000).

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Roy Simino (“Simino”) appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the Honorable James R. Hartenbach presiding, after the court denied Simino’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after Simino pled guilty to one count of Criminal Nonsupport, Section 568.040 RSMo. (2000).

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Simino v. State, 195 S.W.3d 548, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1053, 2006 WL 1889939 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

195 S.W.3d 548 (Simino v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related