Simerly v. Brooks
This text of 93 S.E. 1017 (Simerly v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A surety upon a bond dissolving a garnishment may by affidavit of illegality successfully attack the judgment rendered against him as such surety, by alleging and proving that it was rendered without the introduction of the judgment against the garnishee. Smith v. Kennedy, 125 Ga. 830 (54 S. E. 731).
2. Before judgment can be rendered upon a bond dissolving a garnishment, two prior judgments must have been rendered, — first, a judgment in the main action; and second, a judgment declaring the money or property subject. National Surety Co. v. Medlock, 2 Ga. App. 669 (58 S. E. 1131); Middleton v. Johnson, 19 Ga. App. 478 (91 S. E. 785). Upon the petition and the answer it was not error for the court to sustain the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 S.E. 1017, 21 Ga. App. 169, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simerly-v-brooks-gactapp-1917.