Simeon Dewayne Thomas v. State
This text of Simeon Dewayne Thomas v. State (Simeon Dewayne Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered November 19, 2018
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00202-CR
SIMEON DEWAYNE THOMAS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17-71405-N
ORDER Our review of the record and the parties’ briefing has identified a number of errors in the
trial court’s judgment. Appellant Simon Thomas has pointed out three such errors:
there was no plea bargain agreement;
appellant did not plead guilty; and
appellant did not waive his right to a jury trial.
The State has pointed out additional errors:
the judgment does not reflect information required by the Code of Criminal Procedure’s article 42.01, including: that evidence was submitted to the jury, that the jury was charged by the court, the jury’s verdict, that the defendant was adjudged guilty by the jury, and the plea and findings on the second enhancement paragraph; and
the name of the controlled substance is misspelled. The majority of these errors proceed from the trial court’s use of an incorrect judgment
form. The form employed in the case is titled Judgment of Conviction by Court – Waiver of Jury
Trial. The correct form would have been the one titled Judgment of Conviction by Jury.
Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the trial court to prepare and sign a corrected
judgment, using the form appropriate for a judgment of conviction by a jury, and including all
statutorily required information. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental clerk’s
record containing the corrected judgment to this Court no later than December 3, 2018. This
appeal cannot proceed with an incorrect judgment: the Rules of Appellate Procedure forbid us to
affirm or reverse a judgment if the trial court’s erroneous action can be corrected by the trial
court. TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal
shall be reinstated TWENTY-ONE DAYS from the date of this order or when we receive the
supplemental clerk’s record, whichever is earlier.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Simeon Dewayne Thomas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simeon-dewayne-thomas-v-state-texapp-2018.