Simeon Coker v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 20, 2019
Docket05-18-01411-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Simeon Coker v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline (Simeon Coker v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Simeon Coker v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Order entered March 20, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01411-CV

SIMEON COKER, Appellant

V.

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-15478

ORDER Both the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record in this case are overdue. By postcard

dated December 20, 2018, we notified the Dallas County District Clerk that the clerk’s record

was overdue and directed her to file the clerk’s record within thirty days. Also by postcard dated

December 20, 2018, we notified Melba Wright, Official Court Reporter for the 19st Judicial

District Court, that the reporter’s record was overdue and directed her to file the reporter’s record

within thirty days. On January 10, 2019, Ms. Wright informed the Court the reporter’s record

had not been filed because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s

record. On January 22, 2019, appellant replied to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record

stating he “is in the process of sending the payment via mail.” The Dallas County Clerk has

failed to respond to our notice regarding the clerk’s record. Accordingly, this Court ORDERS Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, to file,

within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the clerk’s record or (2) written

verification that appellant has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and

that appellant has not been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We notify

appellant that if we receive verification he has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the

clerk’s record and has not been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs, we will,

without further notice, dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

We also ORDER Ms. Wright, Official Court Reporter for the 191st Judicial District

Court, to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record; or (2)

written verification that appellant has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s

record and that appellant has not been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We

notify appellant that if we receive verification he has not paid for or made arrangements to pay

for the reporter’s record and has not been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs, we

will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

following persons:

Felicia Pitre Dallas County District Clerk

Melba Wright Official Court Reporter 191st Judicial District Court

Gena Slaughter Presiding Judge 191st Judicial District Court

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Simeon Coker v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simeon-coker-v-commission-for-lawyer-discipline-texapp-2019.