Simbara Hydara v. Michael B. Mukasey
This text of 324 F. App'x 534 (Simbara Hydara v. Michael B. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Simbara Hydara appeals from the district court’s 2 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Upon careful de novo review, see Abdullah v. Hedrick, 392 F.3d 957, 959 (8th Cir.2004), we conclude that the district court’s decision was proper for the reasons expressed by the district court, see Lema v. INS, 341 F.3d 853, 854-57 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Patrick J. Schütz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting in part the report and recommendations of the Honorable Janie S. Mayer-on, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F. App'x 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simbara-hydara-v-michael-b-mukasey-ca8-2009.