Simba v. Britt

212 F. App'x 204
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 5, 2007·No. No. 06-7753·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ya Jelani Simba seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his § 1983 complaint without prejudice to filing a new complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Simba seeks to appeal is not an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simba v. Britt, 212 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2007).

212 F. App'x 204 (Simba v. Britt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related