Sima v. Sima
337 So. 2d 863
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 1976·No. No. 76-1239·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Pursuant to the authority of Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26, Fla.App.2d 1975, a trial court has jurisdiction to hear evidence and decide whether a modification of rehabilitative alimony should be granted or, if the circumstances warrant, a complete revisitation of the alimony question.
Therefore, the trial court erred in holding that it was limited in its jurisdiction to only extending the rehabilitative alimony.
Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing in accordance with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sima v. Sima, 337 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).
337 So. 2d 863 (Sima v. Sima) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McLauchlin v. McLauchlin
580 So. 2d 812 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Pujals v. Pujals
414 So. 2d 228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)