Sima v. Sima
This text of 337 So. 2d 863 (Sima v. Sima) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to the authority of Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26, Fla.App.2d 1975, a trial court has jurisdiction to hear evidence and decide whether a modification of rehabilitative alimony should be granted or, if the circumstances warrant, a complete revisitation of the alimony question.
Therefore, the trial court erred in holding that it was limited in its jurisdiction to only extending the rehabilitative alimony.
Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing in accordance with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
337 So. 2d 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sima-v-sima-fladistctapp-1976.