Sim L. Nichols v. United States Steel Corporation

245 F.2d 238, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3226
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 6, 1957·No. 12985_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following the reversal of the judgment of the District Court, U. S. Steel Corporation v. Nichols, 6 Cir., 229 F.2d 396, and denial by the Supreme Court of Petition for Certiorari, 351 U.S. 950, 76 S.Ct. 846, 100 L.Ed. 1474, the plaintiff-appellant moved in the District Court, without amendment of the pleadings and without introduction of additional evidence, that the Court amend its findings of fact and make additional findings as particularly requested therein. The Court denied the motion and entered judgment dismissing the complaint, from which ruling this appeal was taken. The Court expressed the opinion that to adopt the proposals of the plaintiff-appellant would be inconsistent with its prior memorandum setting out the facts and would constitute a summary or collation of evidential facts rather than findings of ultimate faets contemplated by Rule *239 52(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A.

The Court, being of the opinion that the findings of fact of the District Court contain the ultimate essential facts necessary for the decision of this case, and for the reasons expressed by the District Court, and in accordance with the views of this Court as set out in its opinion on the prior appeal of this case, 6 Cir., 229 F.2d 396;

It is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sim L. Nichols v. United States Steel Corporation, 245 F.2d 238, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3226 (6th Cir. 1957).

245 F.2d 238 (Sim L. Nichols v. United States Steel Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related