Silvious v. American Family Publishers

922 F.2d 836, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7398, 1991 WL 1823
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 14, 1991
Docket90-2151
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 922 F.2d 836 (Silvious v. American Family Publishers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silvious v. American Family Publishers, 922 F.2d 836, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7398, 1991 WL 1823 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

922 F.2d 836
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Owen Franklin SILVIOUS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN FAMILY PUBLISHERS, Ed McMahon, Playboy Enterprises,
Incorporated, M Magazine, Entrepreneur Magazine, Ebony
Magazine, Sports Illustrated Magazine, Life Magazine,
McCalls Magazine, Esquire Magazine, Popular Science
Magazine, Redbook Magazine, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-2151.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Jan. 14, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-40-C-K)

Owen Franklin Silvious, appellant pro se.

Richard Wayne Gallagher, Stephen Frederick Gandee, McNeer, Highland & McMunn, Clarksburg, W.Va., for appellees.

N.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Owen Franklin Silvious appeals from the district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment in his contract action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Silvious v. American Family Publishers, CA-90-40-C-K (N.D.W.Va. July 30, 1990). We grant leave to appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re American Family Enterprises
256 B.R. 377 (D. New Jersey, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
922 F.2d 836, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7398, 1991 WL 1823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silvious-v-american-family-publishers-ca4-1991.