Silvia Galvan v. City of Los Angeles

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedFebruary 18, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-06550
StatusUnknown

This text of Silvia Galvan v. City of Los Angeles (Silvia Galvan v. City of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silvia Galvan v. City of Los Angeles, (C.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 SILVIA GALVAN, an individual Case No. 2:20-cv-06550 DSF (MAAx) 12 and as a Personal Representative of [Assigned to Hon. Judge Dale S. Fischer, Ctrm. 7D] [Assigned to Mag. Maria A. Audero, Ctrm. 690] Frank Patrick Mariscal, and FRANK 13 MARISCAL, an individual, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 14 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 15 v. 16 CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS 17 ANGELES POLICE 18 DEPARTMENT; MICHEL MOORE, CHIEF OF LOS 19 ANGELES POLICE 20 DEPARTMENT, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 21 22 Defendant(s). 23 24 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 25 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 26 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 27 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 28 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 1 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 2 Stipulated Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or 3 responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and 4 use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential 5 treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as 6 set forth in Section 13.3 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle 7 them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the 8 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a 9 party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. Discovery in this 10 action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private 11 information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for 12 any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 13 14 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 15 This action is likely to involve confidential information contained in police 16 reports and audio/video recordings, and photographs. Such confidential and 17 proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things: police 18 investigative reports, body-worn video, digital in-car video, audio recordings, 19 photographs of police officers, and city attorney work product protected under the 20 Official Information Privilege, California Evidence Code sections 1040 (Official 21 Government Information); Deliberative Process information protected under ACLU 22 v. Superior Court, 202 Cal.App.4th 55, 75 (2011) (quoting Regents of University of 23 California v. Superior Court, 20 Cal.4th 509, 540 (1999)); Work Product 24 information protected under California Penal Code Sections 1054.6; State Summary 25 Criminal History Information protected under California Penal Code Sections 26 11105, 11120 et. seq., 11142, 1143, 13302, 13304 and 1203.05 [State Summary 27 Criminal History Information statements ("rap sheets") received by the District or 28 City Attorney from the California State Department of Justice are objected to as 1 constituting a request for the production of Official Information, and as imposing 2 undue burden, annoyance, oppression and expense, by way of potential 3 misdemeanor liability on the District or City Attorney's Office]; and Confidential 4 Witness Information protected under California Penal Code section 841.5 which 5 prevents disclosure of the addresses and telephone numbers of witnesses to an 6 alleged criminal offense to the person who may be a defendant in any prosecution 7 for that offense; all of the foregoing types of information otherwise generally 8 unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from 9 disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common 10 law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 11 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 12 protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the 13 parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for 14 and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and 15 serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this 16 matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as 17 confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good 18 faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and 19 there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 20 21 3. DEFINITIONS 22 3.1. Action: This pending lawsuit: Silvia Galvan, et al. v. City of Los 23 Angeles, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-06550 DSF (MAAx). 24 3.2. Challenging Party: A Party or Nonparty that challenges the 25 designation of information or items under this Stipulated Protective 26 Order. 27 3.3. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of 28 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that 1 qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and 2 as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. (Defendants 3 request that the following language be added: This also includes (1) 4 any information copied or extracted from the Confidential information; 5 (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries or compilations of Confidential 6 information; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations 7 that might reveal Confidential information.) 8 3.4. Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel (as well 9 as their support staff). 10 3.5. Designating Party: A Party or Nonparty that designates information or 11 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 12 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 13 3.6. Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless 14 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or 15 maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and 16 tangible things), that is produced or generated in disclosures or 17 responses to discovery in this matter. 18 3.7. Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a 19 matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its 20 counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 21 3.8. In-House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this 22 Action. In-House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of 23 Record or any other outside counsel. 24 3.9. Nonparty: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, 25 or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 26 3.10. Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a 27 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to 28 this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or 1 are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that 2 party, and includes support staff. 3 3.11. Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 4 employees, consultants, retained experts, In-House Counsel, and 5 Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 6 3.12. Producing Party: A Party or Nonparty that produces Disclosure or 7 Discovery Material in this Action. 8 3.13. Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation 9 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, 10 preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or 11 retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 12 subcontractors. 13 3.14. Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 14 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 15 3.15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Silvia Galvan v. City of Los Angeles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silvia-galvan-v-city-of-los-angeles-cacd-2021.