Silvia Esparza-Gaytan v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
This text of 440 F. App'x 517 (Silvia Esparza-Gaytan v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mexican citizen Silvia Esparza-Gaytan petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an immigration judge’s decision to deny her motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Esparza-Gaytan’s motion to reopen. See Valencia v. Holder, 657 F.3d 745, 748 (8th Cir.2011) (standard of review); Patel v. Holder, 652 F.3d 962, 969 (8th Cir.2011) (discussing when presumption of effective service arises and how it may be rebutted). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 F. App'x 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silvia-esparza-gaytan-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca8-2011.