Silvia Alfaro v. Banter by Piercing Pagoda

Opinion

Case 8:22-cv-00266-CJC-ADS Document 27 Filed 05/23/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:366

JS-6 1

10 SILVIA ALFARO, on behalf of herself CASE NO: 8:22-cv-00266-CJC-ADS

11 and all others similarly situated, [Assigned to the Hon. Cormac J. Carney] 12 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS FOR DISMISSAL OF 14 CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE v.

State Action Filed: December 21, 2021 16 BANTER BY PIERCING PAGODA, an Removal Date: February 18, 2022 Ohio corporation; PIERCING 17 PAGODA, an Ohio corporation; ZALE (Orange County Superior Court, Case No.: 30-2021-01237686-CU-OE-CXC) 18 DELAWARE, INC., a Delaware

corporation; AMANDA HORN, an 19 individual; and DOES 1 through 100, 20 inclusive,

21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 BIBIYL Aaw N O LAff Wice Gs Rof O UP 28 84A 8 P 4 r Wof ie lss hs ii ro en Bal l vC do .,r p So ur ia teti o 5n 0 0 Beverly ( 3H 1il 0ls ), 4C 3a 8l -if 5o 5rn 5i 5a 90211 ORDER RE STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case $:22-cv-00266-CJC-ADS Document 27 Filed 05/23/22 Page 2of2 Page ID #:367

2 The Court, having read and considered the foregoing stipulation of the 3 Parties, and good cause appearing therefor, orders as follows: 4 l. The above captioned action is dismissed without prejudice as to all 5 claims. 6 2. Each party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs in connection 7 with this dismissal.

49 Dated: May 23, 2022 i oe Hon. Corniac J. Carney 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RE STIPULATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS