Silveus v. Sayers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Silveus v. Sayers

67 Pa. Super. 8, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 329

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 7, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 87

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 67 Pa. Super. 8 (Silveus v. Sayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silveus v. Sayers, 67 Pa. Super. 8, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 329 (Pa. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Kephart, J.,

The motion to quash this appeal must be sustained. An order directing an interpleader and awarding a feigned issue is interlocutory from which an appeal will not lie. Paugh v. Delaware County Trust Co., 62 Pa. Superior Ct. 523, was an appeal from an order discharging a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The court in declining to grant the judgment framed an issue between the rival claimants to the fund, the interventor having been made a party to the action.

The report of the case did not contain a reference to the court’s action on the rule for judgment.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI