Silverstein's Appeal from Probate

Connecticut Appellate Court

Silverstein's Appeal from Probate

559 A.2d 1190, 18 Conn. App. 821, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 172

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMay 18, 1989

Docket7446

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 559 A.2d 1190 (Silverstein's Appeal from Probate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silverstein's Appeal from Probate, 559 A.2d 1190, 18 Conn. App. 821, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 172 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this probate appeal, the plaintiff, Morris Süverstein, executor of the estate of Esther S. Süverstein, has raised fifteen claims of error that either challenge the factual findings of the trial court or implicate its discretionary powers.

Our review of those allegations of error properly before us fails to disclose that the factual findings of the trial court are clearly erroneous in view of the evidence and pleadings in the whole record, or that the decision is otherwise erroneous in law. See Practice Book § 4061. Moreover, we have determined that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in conformity with applicable law.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this probate appeal, the plaintiff, Morris Süverstein, executor of the estate of Esther S. Süverstein, has raised fifteen claims of error that either challenge the factual findings of the trial court or implicate its discretionary powers.

Our review of those allegations of error properly before us fails to disclose that the factual findings of the trial court are clearly erroneous in view of the evidence and pleadings in the whole record, or that the decision is otherwise erroneous in law. See Practice Book § 4061. Moreover, we have determined that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in conformity with applicable law.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 A.2d 1190, 18 Conn. App. 821, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silversteins-appeal-from-probate-connappct-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack