Silverstein v. State Road Department

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Silverstein v. State Road Department

204 So. 2d 901, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4163

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 26, 1967

DocketNo. I-54

StatusPublished

This text of 204 So. 2d 901 (Silverstein v. State Road Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silverstein v. State Road Department, 204 So. 2d 901, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was jointly tried with the companion cases of Anderson v. State Road Department, 204 So.2d 899, cases numbered H-461 and H^462 in the records of this court, opinion filed simultaneously with this opinion. The basic issue raised in the appeal of the latter case is substantially the same as that raised in the present appeal, and the principles recognized and applied in the Anderson cases are controlling in the instant appeal. Accordingly, on the authority of our said Anderson decision, the final [902]*902judgment appealed from herein should be, and it is, reversed and the cause is remanded with instructions for a new trial.

CARROLL, CHARLES, Acting C. J., RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case was jointly tried with the companion cases of Anderson v. State Road Department, 204 So.2d 899, cases numbered H-461 and H^462 in the records of this court, opinion filed simultaneously with this opinion. The basic issue raised in the appeal of the latter case is substantially the same as that raised in the present appeal, and the principles recognized and applied in the Anderson cases are controlling in the instant appeal. Accordingly, on the authority of our said Anderson decision, the final [902]*902judgment appealed from herein should be, and it is, reversed and the cause is remanded with instructions for a new trial.

CARROLL, CHARLES, Acting C. J., RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 So. 2d 901, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverstein-v-state-road-department-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack