Silverstein v. Perlman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Silverstein v. Perlman

248 A.D. 640

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order granting defendant’s motion to examine a witness before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. It will be necessary for the plaintiff to call this witness on the trial. The proposed examination by the defendant is merely a cross-examination before trial. No special circumstances are shown which would warrant the granting of the examination. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting defendant’s motion to examine a witness before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. It will be necessary for the plaintiff to call this witness on the trial. The proposed examination by the defendant is merely a cross-examination before trial. No special circumstances are shown which would warrant the granting of the examination. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Silverstein v. Perlman, 248 A.D. 640 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 640 (Silverstein v. Perlman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.