Silverstein v. Perlman
This text of 248 A.D. 640 (Silverstein v. Perlman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting defendant’s motion to examine a witness before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. It will be necessary for the plaintiff to call this witness on the trial. The proposed examination by the defendant is merely a cross-examination before trial. No special circumstances are shown which would warrant the granting of the examination. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverstein-v-perlman-nyappdiv-1936.