Silverstein v. National Auto Renting Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Silverstein v. National Auto Renting Corp.

4 A.D.2d 869, 166 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4251

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 22, 1957·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The disbursements of the substituted attorney at best could only be an advance on behalf of the client. When the relationship of attorney and client was terminated, the substituted attorney was entitled to be reimbursed for the disbursements properly chargeable against the client. The order appealed from is modified so as to remit the matter to Special Term for determination of the amount of disbursements to be paid before the papers are released. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Valente, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The disbursements of the substituted attorney at best could only be an advance on behalf of the client. When the relationship of attorney and client was terminated, the substituted attorney was entitled to be reimbursed for the disbursements properly chargeable against the client. The order appealed from is modified so as to remit the matter to Special Term for determination of the amount of disbursements to be paid before the papers are released. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Valente, JJ.

Silverstein v. National Auto Renting Corp., 4 A.D.2d 869, 166 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

4 A.D.2d 869 (Silverstein v. National Auto Renting Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related