Silverstein v. . Commercial Casualty Ins. Co.

143 N.E. 231, 237 N.Y. 391, 35 A.L.R. 32, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 836
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 19, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 143 N.E. 231 (Silverstein v. . Commercial Casualty Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silverstein v. . Commercial Casualty Ins. Co., 143 N.E. 231, 237 N.Y. 391, 35 A.L.R. 32, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 836 (N.Y. 1924).

Opinion

Andrews, J.

Harry Silverstein was a passenger in a side car attached to a motorcycle. The machine was driven by a friend. It capsized killing Silverstein. His widow brings this action to recover upon an accident insurance policy. If anything is due, the amount is not in dispute. Her complaint was dismissed because it was *393 provided in the policy that it does not cover injuries received while riding a motorcycle.”

Where a provision in an insurance policy is ambiguous; where without giving to the language used a forced or unnatural meaning, a construction in favor of the insured may fairly be adopted, to that construction he is entitled. To ride ” used as a transitive verb is annexed the idea of control or management. In standard dictionaries, among other definitions are found to manage or control while seated on; ” “ to sit on and control so as to be carried, as to ride a horse, to ride a bicycle; ” “ to control and manage.” When Marlborough, rides the whirlwind he is not swept helplessly along. He directs the storm. A baby in a basket attached to the handle bar does not ride the bicycle. A friend who tells you he has been riding a horse conveys the impression that he has done more than to rest passively on its back while the horse was led by another. You say to a child sitting on a horse which his father controls that he is riding. You flatter him by likening his adventure to that of his elders, as when his hand rests on the reins you tell him he is driving. The defendant, itself, seems to hesitate as to the proper meaning of the words. In the answer it quotes the clause and then alleges that the deceased was killed not while riding but while riding in or upon a motorcycle.” ■

The insured, therefore, might fairly give this interpretation to the contract. The result in the courts below was erroneous. Especially is it so when in no sense did Silverstein mount the machine. He sat not on but in the car. As no other defense is suggested, the verdict reached by the jury at Trial Term under direction of the judge should be reinstated and judgment granted to the plaintiff thereon, with costs in all courts.

Pound, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ., concur; His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo and Lehman, JJ., dissent.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenspan v. Travelers Insurance
98 Misc. 2d 43 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)
Tuchman v. Public Service Mutual Insurance
88 Misc. 2d 336 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1976)
Kronfeld v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
53 A.D.2d 190 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Goldner v. Otsego Mutual Fire Insurance
39 A.D.2d 440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
John F. Welgan, Inc. v. Government Employees Insurance
49 Misc. 2d 816 (New York County Courts, 1966)
Sincoff v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
183 N.E.2d 899 (New York Court of Appeals, 1962)
Sincoff v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
25 Misc. 2d 530 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Turner v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
5 Misc. 2d 524 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Bronx Savings Bank v. Weigandt
136 N.E.2d 848 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)
Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co
178 F.2d 750 (Second Circuit, 1949)
Plumbing v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.
195 Misc. 251 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1949)
Pearlstein v. New York Life Insurance
194 Misc. 654 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
47 N.E.2d 687 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
Bolt v. Life Casualty Ins. Co.
152 S.E. 766 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)
Colyer v. North American Accident Insurance
132 Misc. 701 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)
Kean v. Maryland Casualty Co.
221 A.D. 184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Posner v. Insurance Co. of North America
300 F. 383 (S.D. New York, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 N.E. 231, 237 N.Y. 391, 35 A.L.R. 32, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverstein-v-commercial-casualty-ins-co-ny-1924.