Silversmith v. United States

• Court: District Court, D. Arizona
• Decided: July 18, 2022
• Docket: 2:20-cv-01421
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Isaac Steven Silversmith, No. CV-20-01421-PHX-ROS

10 Petitioner, ORDER

11 v.

12 United States of America,

13 Respondent. 14 15 Before the Court is Movant Isaac Steven Silversmith’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside 16 or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 19). The § 2255 Motion argues 17 Silversmith’s conviction for use of a firearm during a crime of violence pursuant to the 18 Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), is invalid because the 19 predicate offense, second-degree murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111, is not a “crime 20 of violence” in light of Borden v. United States, 141 S.Ct. 1817 (2021). (Doc. 19 at 3-12). 21 In Borden, the Supreme Court held a crime requiring a mens rea of mere recklessness is 22 not a “violent felony” within the meaning of a different subsection of the ACCA, § 924(e). 23 See Borden, 141 S.Ct. at 1834. Borden expressly left open the question whether a mens 24 rea of “extreme recklessness”—the mens rea element for second-degree murder in 25 violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111(a)—could constitute a crime of violence. Id. at 1825 n.4. 26 On October 27, 2021, the Ninth Circuit ordered en banc rehearing in United States 27 v. Begay and vacated a panel opinion that held second-degree murder is not a crime of 28 violence. Begay, 15 F.4th 1254 (9th Cir. 2021), vacating 934 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2019). 1 On November 19, 2021, the Court stayed proceedings in this matter pending resolution of 2 Begay. (Doc. 24). On May 5, 2022, the Ninth Circuit sitting en banc held second-degree 3 murder is a crime of violence within the meaning of thee ACCA. Begay, 33 F.4th 1081, 4 1093 (9th Cir. 2022) (en banc). 5 On May 27, Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns issued an Order requiring 6 Silversmith to show cause why this action should not be dismissed in light of Begay. (Doc. 7 26). In his response, Silversmith states he “does not oppose the lifting of the Stay Order 8 so that this Court may proceed with its decision” and admits “the Begay decision would 9 appear to foreclose relief (at least in this Circuit) at this time.” (Doc. 27). Judge Burns 10 accordingly issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court 11 lift the stay and deny and dismiss Silversmith’s § 2255 Motion with prejudice. (Doc. 28 at 12 3). 13 The Court finds the R&R accurately recounts the facts and law of this case. The 14 R&R will therefore be adopted. 15 Accordingly, 16 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 28) is ADOPTED. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the stay ordered on November 19, 2021 (Doc. 24) 18 is lifted. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Movant Isaac Steven Silversmith’s Motion to 20 Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 19) is DENIED 21 WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter. 22 … 23 … 24 … 25 … 26 … 27 … 28 … 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED because 2|| this ruling is justified by United States v. Begay, 33 F.4th 1081, 1093 (9th Cir. 2022) (en || banc) and because Silversmith has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a 4|| constitutional right. Jurists of reason would not find this ruling debatable. 5 Dated this 15th day of July, 2022. 6 fo - 7 ( — .

9 Senior United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-3-