Silvers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

760 So. 2d 232, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5791, 2000 WL 628331
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 2000·No. No. 4D99-2920·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FARMER, J.

Appellant’s complaint joining successive tortfeasors in a single action and alleging that she was unable to apportion her injuries between them stated a cause of action and was not defective for “improper join-der.” See Lawrence v. Hethcox, 283 So.2d 41 (Fla.1973) (holding that separate trials for successive tortfeasors causing unappor-tionable damages would “enhance the difficulties of proof and tend to obstruct, rather than to promote, justice” and that it is an abuse of discretion not to permit join-der of successive tortfeasors where apportionment of damages is alleged to be impossible).

REVERSED.

DELL and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silvers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 760 So. 2d 232, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5791, 2000 WL 628331 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

760 So. 2d 232 (Silvers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Froats v. Baron
883 So. 2d 885 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Treasure Coast, Inc. v. Ludlum Const. Co., Inc.
760 So. 2d 232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)