Silvers v. Katz
This text of 281 A.D. 996 (Silvers v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and for other relief, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment under rule 113 or for partial summary judgment under rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice, but on its own motion granted a preference in order of trial. Defendants appeal from the order insofar as it grants the preference. Order, insofar as appeal is taken, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 996, 121 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silvers-v-katz-nyappdiv-1953.