Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Silverman v. Tartan Oil Corp.

Silverman v. Tartan Oil Corp.

228 A.D.2d 428, 643 N.Y.2d 416, 643 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6224
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D.2d 428 (Silverman v. Tartan Oil Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silverman v. Tartan Oil Corp., 228 A.D.2d 428, 643 N.Y.2d 416, 643 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, termination of the lease was not the plaintiffs’ exclusive remedy for the defendant’s failure to pay rent (see, Terminal Cent. v Modell & Co., 212 AD2d 213).

[429]*429The plaintiffs’ contention that this Court should sua sponte grant their cross motion is without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terminal Central, Inc. v. Henry Modell & Co.
212 A.D.2d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 428, 643 N.Y.2d 416, 643 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-tartan-oil-corp-nyappdiv-1996.