Silverman v. Tartan Oil Corp.
228 A.D.2d 428, 643 N.Y.2d 416, 643 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6224
Opinion
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, termination of the lease was not the plaintiffs’ exclusive remedy for the defendant’s failure to pay rent (see, Terminal Cent. v Modell & Co., 212 AD2d 213).
[429] The plaintiffs’ contention that this Court should sua sponte grant their cross motion is without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Silverman v. Tartan Oil Corp., 228 A.D.2d 428, 643 N.Y.2d 416, 643 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 428 (Silverman v. Tartan Oil Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Terminal Central, Inc. v. Henry Modell & Co.
212 A.D.2d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)