Silverman v. Sterling National Bank & Trust Co.

246 A.D. 839

This text of 246 A.D. 839 (Silverman v. Sterling National Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silverman v. Sterling National Bank & Trust Co., 246 A.D. 839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment, pursuant to rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The answer and the documentary evidence annexed thereto raise a defense sufficient as a matter of law to defeat the plaintiff’s proof; and there remains no triable issue of fact. Young, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-sterling-national-bank-trust-co-nyappdiv-1936.