Silverman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Silverman v. State

610 So. 2d 116, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13036, 1992 WL 385422

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 30, 1992

DocketNo. 91-2544

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 610 So. 2d 116 (Silverman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silverman v. State, 610 So. 2d 116, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13036, 1992 WL 385422 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the adjudication and sentence for violation of probation of appellant, Alan Silverman. There was not a founded suspicion for the stop of the vehicle in which appellant was a passenger. Appellant argues that simply because the vehicle in which he was a passenger was in an area where burglaries frequently occurred would not constitute grounds for a legal stop or detention. We agree. See State v. Beja, 451 So.2d 882 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), cause dismissed sub nom, State v. Lennon, 469 So.2d 750 (Fla.1985); see also Abraham v. State, 532 So.2d 91, 92 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (driving out of closed business parking lot in early morning hours before dawn and picking up another person in the area is not grounds for “founded suspicion”). Further, appellant, as a passenger had standing to contest the legality of the stop. See, e.g., Nelson v. State, 578 So.2d 694, 695-96 (Fla.1991).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., HERSEY, J., and DOWNEY,' JAMES C., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the adjudication and sentence for violation of probation of appellant, Alan Silverman. There was not a founded suspicion for the stop of the vehicle in which appellant was a passenger. Appellant argues that simply because the vehicle in which he was a passenger was in an area where burglaries frequently occurred would not constitute grounds for a legal stop or detention. We agree. See State v. Beja, 451 So.2d 882 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), cause dismissed sub nom, State v. Lennon, 469 So.2d 750 (Fla.1985); see also Abraham v. State, 532 So.2d 91, 92 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (driving out of closed business parking lot in early morning hours before dawn and picking up another person in the area is not grounds for “founded suspicion”). Further, appellant, as a passenger had standing to contest the legality of the stop. See, e.g., Nelson v. State, 578 So.2d 694, 695-96 (Fla.1991).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., HERSEY, J., and DOWNEY,' JAMES C., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

610 So. 2d 116, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13036, 1992 WL 385422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack