Silverman v. Silverman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Silverman v. Silverman

258 A.D. 985, 17 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8552

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 985 (Silverman v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silverman v. Silverman, 258 A.D. 985, 17 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion to modify the final decree of separation entered in her favor on June 26, 1934, so that the amount awarded to plaintiff for the support and maintenance of the infant daughter of the parties be increased from eight dollars a week to twenty-five dollars a week. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to Special Term to take proof as to defendant’s present financial circumstances. At the time the decree was entered defendant’s earnings were twenty dollars a week. He admits they are now thirty dollars a week and plaintiff alleges that they are in excess of that amount. The motion cannot be decided until defendant’s earnings are determined. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion to modify the final decree of separation entered in her favor on June 26, 1934, so that the amount awarded to plaintiff for the support and maintenance of the infant daughter of the parties be increased from eight dollars a week to twenty-five dollars a week. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to Special Term to take proof as to defendant’s present financial circumstances. At the time the decree was entered defendant’s earnings were twenty dollars a week. He admits they are now thirty dollars a week and plaintiff alleges that they are in excess of that amount. The motion cannot be decided until defendant’s earnings are determined. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 985, 17 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-silverman-nyappdiv-1940.