Silverman v. Silverman

5 N.E. 639, 140 Mass. 560, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 96
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 11, 1886·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Gardner, J.

At the trial of this case, the court found, as facts, that the parties were lawfully married to each other; that [562]*562the husband deserted the wife; and that she executed and delivered to him a release, for which he paid her $500.

It has been frequently decided by this court that husband and wife are incompetent to contract with each other, and that such contracts have no validity at law. Bassett v. Bassett, 112 Mass. 99. Ingham v. White, 4 Allen, 412. Gay v. Kingsley, 11 Allen, 345. Roby v. Phelon, 118 Mass. 541.

The petitioner is therefore not bound by the alleged contract which she has made with her lawful husband, and is not debarred thereby from the rights which she is seeking under her petition. The exceptions must therefore be overruled, and the

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silverman v. Silverman, 5 N.E. 639, 140 Mass. 560, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 96 (Mass. 1886).

5 N.E. 639 (Silverman v. Silverman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jordan Marsh Co. v. Cohen
136 N.E. 350 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Malden Hospital v. Murdock
105 N.E. 457 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Atkins v. Atkins
80 N.E. 806 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Bailey v. Dillon
66 L.R.A. 427 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)