Silverman v. Silverman
This text of 5 N.E. 639 (Silverman v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the trial of this case, the court found, as facts, that the parties were lawfully married to each other; that [562]*562the husband deserted the wife; and that she executed and delivered to him a release, for which he paid her $500.
It has been frequently decided by this court that husband and wife are incompetent to contract with each other, and that such contracts have no validity at law. Bassett v. Bassett, 112 Mass. 99. Ingham v. White, 4 Allen, 412. Gay v. Kingsley, 11 Allen, 345. Roby v. Phelon, 118 Mass. 541.
The petitioner is therefore not bound by the alleged contract which she has made with her lawful husband, and is not debarred thereby from the rights which she is seeking under her petition. The exceptions must therefore be overruled, and the
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 N.E. 639, 140 Mass. 560, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-silverman-mass-1886.