Silverman v. Rogers Imports, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Silverman v. Rogers Imports, Inc.

281 A.D. 960, 120 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3898

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D. 960 (Silverman v. Rogers Imports, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silverman v. Rogers Imports, Inc., 281 A.D. 960, 120 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified by directing that the plaintiff, Irving Silverman, be made a party to the trial of the issue as to the validity of the contract in question. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ.; Breitel, J., dissents and votes to modify the order appealed from to the extent of requiring the issue as to the validity of the execution of the contract between the corporation and Irving Silverman to be framed, and to be tried together with the issues already framed in the order of Special Term as to the validity of the execution of the same contract between the corporation and Shirley Silverman; such series of issue as framed may or may not be identical, as may be provided for in the order to be settled herein. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by directing that the plaintiff, Irving Silverman, be made a party to the trial of the issue as to the validity of the contract in question. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ.; Breitel, J., dissents and votes to modify the order appealed from to the extent of requiring the issue as to the validity of the execution of the contract between the corporation and Irving Silverman to be framed, and to be tried together with the issues already framed in the order of Special Term as to the validity of the execution of the same contract between the corporation and Shirley Silverman; such series of issue as framed may or may not be identical, as may be provided for in the order to be settled herein. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 960, 120 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-rogers-imports-inc-nyappdiv-1953.